Then, there are also legitimate websites run by those with true knowledge of the things you want to know about, such as digital marketing agencies (like us at Rock Content) with experience in their fields.
To make sure the information you’re working with is factual and comes from a solid background (and to pass EAT requirements), you need to look for an authoritative source.
Where to Look for an Authoritative Source
If you use Google, there is a helpful trick that can assist you when looking for Whatsapp Number List content on .edu, .gov, or .org sites. Type in your search term followed by “site:.gov” or “site:.edu.”
By doing this, you’re telling Google that you only want .gov or .edu websites in your results.
Search for an exact match
Another option that can help you get access to an authoritative source involves going directly to a source you trust. For example, maybe you’re writing content on a piece containing medical information.
You could type in “Cleveland Clinic” and visit the hospital’s website to explore medical content related to your marketing work.
Similarly, you can seek exact matches for journals or educational institutes as needed. Just remember, if you go directly to a source, you do need to be sure that it is an authority on the subject.
Look for a specific domain name
Similar to searching for an exact match, looking for a specific domain name can help. For example, imagine that you’re trying to learn more about search engine optimization and are familiar with Semrush.
Typing in “Semrush.com” will take you directly to the company’s website. The same is true for us at RockContent.com.
If you don’t know which domain name to look for, then you’ll want to choose a different option, such as searching for a specific organization or using a keyword to find related content.
Skip Poor Sources and Try the CRAAP Test
Now, on top of being able to find authoritative sources, you should be able to identify poor sources and avoid them. Here is a short list of source types that you don’t want to use for any content that requires authoritative sources:
- User-generated encyclopedias like Wikipedia
- Domains not affiliated with a specific authoritative brand
- Google essay-sharing websites
- Biased news websites (yes, that includes Fox News, CNN, and any outlets affiliated with political parties)
These are just a few types of sources that may not be GN Lists suitable for your research. Still not sure?
Try the CRAAP test.
